Does Assured handle payer contracting as well as credentialing?

Yes. Assured's platform includes payer contracting workflow management alongside credentialing. This is a genuine capability differentiator for organizations that want to manage both functions in a single system. Arctic Health focuses on credentialing and enrollment management and does not provide payer contracting services.

How long does it take to implement Assured's platform?

Full platform implementation timelines vary based on organization size and configuration complexity, but typically range from several weeks to a few months. Arctic Health requires no platform implementation; we begin managing credentialing within days of completing our onboarding process.

Is Assured appropriate for a mid-sized group practice?

Assured's platform is most cost-effective for large health systems and networks that will leverage the full suite of credentialing, contracting, and analytics capabilities. Mid-sized groups primarily needing payer enrollment management typically find a focused managed service more cost-effective.

Arctic Health vs Assured | Credentialing Comparison

Overview

Assured positions itself as a full-stack provider network management platform, which distinguishes it from pure-play credentialing companies in a meaningful way. The platform covers credentialing, payer contracting, provider network analytics, and related workflows in a single system. For large health systems that want to consolidate vendor relationships and manage the full provider network lifecycle in one place, Assured's breadth is a genuine selling point. However, this breadth comes with trade-offs that organizations should evaluate carefully. The first trade-off is implementation complexity. Deploying a full provider network management platform is not a quick process. Configuration, data migration, training, and integration with existing systems take time. During the implementation period, credentialing work still needs to happen. Organizations that choose Assured for their full-platform capabilities should plan for an extended onboarding period before the system is operational. The second trade-off is cost structure. Platform licensing fees plus per-provider operational costs make Assured's total cost of ownership higher than a focused managed service for most organization sizes. The additional functionality may justify the cost for organizations that will genuinely use the contracting and analytics features, but for organizations primarily needing payer enrollment management, the platform premium may not be justified. The third trade-off is flexibility. Platform investments create switching costs. Once Assured is deployed across an organization's credentialing workflows, migrating to another service requires re-implementation effort. Month-to-month contracts with a managed service like Arctic Health preserve the flexibility to adjust vendor relationships as organizational needs change. For organizations evaluating Assured, the key question is whether the contracting and network analytics capabilities justify the implementation investment and platform premium. If the answer is yes, Assured offers capabilities that Arctic Health does not. If credentialing and payer enrollment are the primary needs, Arctic Health delivers those outcomes faster, with more flexibility, and at a lower total cost.

Feature Comparison

Feature	Arctic Health	Assured
Submission Speed	2-day submission from complete provider packet	Varies by service configuration; full-platform deployment may extend onboarding timelines
Pricing Model	Per-provider pricing, no long-term contracts	Platform licensing plus per-provider fees; full-stack pricing reflects broader product scope
Technology	Real-time dashboard with dedicated specialist management	Comprehensive provider network management platform; feature-rich but requires configuration and training
Support Model	Dedicated credentialing specialist per account	Implementation team plus ongoing customer success; specialist access depends on service tier
Payer Coverage	300+ payers including all major commercial and government payers	Payer enrollment coverage through managed service component; breadth may vary by region and contract
Product Scope	Focused on credentialing and payer enrollment as a managed service	Broad platform covering credentialing, contracting, network management, and analytics
Contract Terms	Month-to-month, cancel anytime	Annual platform licenses with implementation commitments; significant switching costs once deployed
Implementation Time	Onboarding in days, no platform implementation required	Full platform implementation may take weeks to months depending on configuration complexity

Where Arctic Health Wins

Arctic Health can begin credentialing immediately with no platform implementation; Assured's full platform deployment requires weeks of configuration before operational benefit is realized
Arctic Health's month-to-month pricing has no platform switching costs; Assured's broad platform creates significant lock-in once configured and deployed across an organization
Arctic Health's per-provider pricing is straightforward; Assured's platform licensing plus per-provider fees make total cost of ownership harder to predict for growing organizations

Where Assured Might Be a Better Fit

Broad platform scope covering credentialing, contracting, and network analytics in a single system reduces the number of vendor relationships for large health systems
Network analytics capabilities provide insights into provider network composition, gaps, and adequacy that pure credentialing services don't offer
Contracting functionality alongside credentialing creates a more complete provider network management workflow for organizations handling their own payer negotiations

Arctic Health vs Assured

Feature Comparison

Where Arctic Health Wins

Where Assured Might Be a Better Fit

Frequently Asked Questions

See How Arctic Health Compares

Ready to Get Your Providers In-Network?